Who is Destroying Our World?
Most Dangerous Operative is the Master Manipulator
The most dangerous person is one who intentionally uses emotionally laden thought stopping constructs, epithets and phrases, then combines these insults with prestige (authority) suggestions, to implant ad-hominems into the subconscious of the spectators. Both the ‘prestige’ and the supposed ‘facts’ used to discredit the target, will depend upon the use of “the reverse blockade” .
The effectiveness of this one METHOD is dependent upon your ignorance of this METHOD and perpetrator’s true intent.
Yes, you just might have to read that first paragraph a 2nd time, do so now. I had to read some of the materials I am trying to explain to you several times, but for those that get it, keep going. The following is called “The Reverse Blockade”. This description, was the first one that offered any explanation as to why Joseph Goebbels’ oft quoted remark ” A lie repeated often enough becomes true” actually worked as well as it does:
The Reverse Blockade
“Reverse Blockade: emphatically insisting upon something which is the opposite of the truth blocks the average person’s mind from perceiving the truth. In accordance with the dictates of healthy common sense, he starts searching for meaning in the “golden mean” between truth and its opposite, winding up with some satisfactory counterfeit. People who think like this do not realize that this effect is precisely the intent of the person who subjects them to this method. ” age 104, Political Ponerology by Andrew M. Lobaczewski
The People Who Think Like This Naturally
“In their paper, “Construct Validity of Psychopathy in a Community Sample… Salekin, Trobst, and Krioukova write “Psychopathy as originally conceived by Cleckley (1941) is not limited to engagement in illegal activities, but rather encompasses such personality characteristics as manipulativeness, insincerity, egocentricity , and lack of guilt – characteristics clearly present in criminals but also in spouses, parents, bosses, attorneys and politicians, and CEOs, to name but a few. (bursten. 1973; Stewart, 1991)…As such. psychopathy may be characterized…as involving a tendency towards dominance and coldness. Wiggens (1995) in summarizing numerous previous findings..indicates such persons are prone to anger and irritation and are willing to exploit others. They are arrogant, manipulative, cynical, exhibitionistic, sensation-seeking, Machiavellian, vindictive and out for their own gain. With respect to their patterns of social exchange (Foa & Foa, 1974), they attribute love and status to themselves, seeing themselves as highly worthy and important, but prescribe neither love nor status to others, seeing them as unworthy and insignificant. ” Page 89, Political Ponerology, footnote
Click to read
“That doesn’t make us sheep in the modern vernacular. We are not becoming docile, stupid, and blindly obedient. On the contrary, we are becoming sheep as the Old Stories understood sheep … intensely selfish, intensely intelligent (but only in an other-regarding way) and intensely dogmatic, willing to pursue a myopic behavior even unto death.“
Out of Context “Facts”
Out of Context, any event can be made to “look” Bad
Case History: 2006 OCMB.Xenu.net
Years ago a young man named Shawn Lonsdale sent me a copy of his deposition, and I webbed it. There was an uproar by many of the same identities that trashed Bob Minton, Gerry Armstrong, and Tom Padgett. The primary mouthpieces was a nick called “Tigger” and due to the fine mind of a nick called “hboats”, it all came down to there was nothing there in the first place!
Tigger: Feel free to ask Mr. Lonsdale this….specifically, “Did Tigger lie”?
Hboats: I pretty much did yesterday when I asked the two questions I asked him. He answered them and the answers say that you lied. If you wanted that question asked specifically why weren’t you here to ask it? It’s not my job to ask the questions you want asked. The questions that I did ask prove that you lied. I’ll point out again how exactly.
Lie #1. The depostion that Arnie ended up webbing was not the ONLY copy that proflex had or the ONLY copy that his lawyer had. Tigger stated more than once that it was.
Lie #2. Proflex never said that he didn’t want Arnie to web the deposition. He in fact thanked Arnie for doing it. Tigger has said more than once that proflex DID NOT WANT ARNIE TO HAVE THE DEPOSITION.
That’ll do it for now, but I’m sure you will look right past the proof like you always do. Thanks for playing
Recently Gerry Armstrong was being slimed using the IDENTICAL TECHNIQUE regarding a video tape. This was mentioned in a thread on SPs’r’US on Facebook about my friend Marisa Sigmond’s recent Video by videographer Bert Leahy. Knowing Gerry’s character, there was again, nothing there.
Tom Padgett recalls he himself being attacked in the same manner a decade ago, and there are many more, regarding Robert Minton, Lawrence Wollershiem, FACTNet and especially FACTNet fundraising when I was Treasurer.
A thinking person might ask himself,
Q: what do the targets of this technique have in common?
Answer: All of them were either litigants with $cientology or a Scientologist as well as activists trying to expose scientology.
What to do: Avoid anyone who intentionally lies.
The Power of Implication
The upsetting episodes, where a person is being attacked for something they did not do, which has happened to me several times over the years… and to Bob Minton many times, because of the REVERSE BLOCKADE creates an implication that there just must be something to it… So the spectators trend to think less of the person who was attacked, subconsciously.
This is an example of the use of emotional charged wording and/accusations to firstly, after stopping thinking, the false accusations get a free pass into the subconscious. Now the prior unpleasantness is forever associated with the mention of that person’s name.
Yet the person is guilty of nothing!
From OSA’s “OPERATIONS OFFICER” write up:
(7) When hitting a group or individual, hitting their finance and comm
This is why it done!! The targets will be those who are guilty of no wrongdoing, yet they end up wearing the albatross of the traumatic attack making them a bit more defensive and unwilling to deal with brevity, but so does ‘the crowd’ that was present for those attacks. This subconscious influence modulates the willingness to support them forever more unless you have learned this METHOD about how this trick is done and THEN spend some mental effort reviewing the events of the past with this new understanding of what you witnessed. Start thinking again about those same attacks and induced miseries that you silently witnessed, or perhaps engaged in or even avoided by walking away and leaving that person a little more alone. You can consciously change your mind about anything, and enjoy thinking again, once you understand how this works.
Making a True Believer
“Everything said to a hypnotized person is true for them” said hypnotist and advisor to OSS/CIA Mr. George Estabrooks in 1943
Compare this to Hubbard: “What is true for you is true for you”
Hubbard used this SAME METHOD to make people believe they had a reactive mind in Dianetics. He tells us about abortions with a coat hanger, electro convulsive shock treatment, and the horror of lobotomies! Then he tells you that you have a reactive Mind, and claims only he can get rid of this thing (that does not exist)… The claim went directly into your subconscious, becoming true for you!
He does the same thing on the higher levels of $cientology, one one called OTIII, only it is body thetans and clusters after telling you an exciting story about the evil alien XENU and get you to envision atomic bomb blasts… You were tricked into belief, by use of this high emotion, visually graphic METHOD of inducing a state of enhanced hypnotic suggestibility, and when he says you have BTs and clusters you then spend thousands of dollars trying to get rid of those!! – or years working as a slave because you did not have enough buy his lies!!
Hubbard’s Extensive use of Demonization in Dianetics and Scientology
Hubbard demonized Psychiatry and most other sources of information in the real world. Why did he pick psychiatry to demonize so thoroughly? Was it because of the gruesome lobotomies, and electroshock treatments? This is what you are supposed to believe as a result of implication.
Eric Hoffer in his must book True Believer quotes Hitler as saying” “If the Jew did not exist, we should have had to invent him. We must have a tangible enemy, not merely an abstract one”.
The abstract enemy is this thing that does not even exist, a figment of Hubbard’s Science Fiction imagination, his invented “The Reactive Mind”.
The tangible enemy are psychiatrists and who are a subdivision of a more general class called suppressive persons. Scientologists have a definition of suppressive person that sounds to me much like the psychopath and sociopathic personalities, but theirs is written in their own nomenclature and I will spare you learning useless data and share the real definition:
Anyone whose knowledge, words or actions interfere with the continued extraction of money from rubes.
The 1995 Raid of Arnie Lerma’s Home
More about the above LINK
Scientology RTC/OSA uses this SAME METHOD to make judges think there is something to their motions! In RTC vs Lerma they filed ex-parte, six inches of paper to get a US Federal Judge to allow the President of RTC to search my home. They never mentioned the FACT that the document, which contained the 1978 version of the OT Levels I-IIX in full, was itself a xerox copy of a exhibit filed as legal document in a case in the Central Judicial District of California!!
Emotional accusations, and loaded language, also associate that person with pain and unpleasantness. Those who have been attacked the most often in this manner, – the uninformed tend to react the same way as a normal person does when they saw the room filled with Hubbard books – the think “There must be something THERE.” Their subconscious associates the unpleasantness of the attacks even when they are false, and merely contrived, with the person. You see, you must really understand this, the subconscious, your subconscious does not THINK, it reacts to and provides emotion and attitudes.
You grant others access to programming your subconscious beliefs at the moment you stop thinking.
Heaven help you if that happens to be a psychopath.
(c) 2015 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
PS: One day I was trying to discuss details about Mr Minton LINK Then a vicious attack was launched upon me. Using the keyword “worm”, Mr Scott Pilutik who was present on IRC that day, and now advises Mr Ortega, or Pooks if she was there, may be able to locate an IRC chat log that would be a terrific example of the method that was used on this writer. Perhaps he has that chat log to post, it would make a hell of a sample lesson that needs desperately to be widely learned. One of the innocent spectators watching that vitriolic attack, was a kid named Shawn Lonsdale, who later told me by telephone how terribly upset it made him, and who, some time later, committed suicide.
“Half the harm that is done in this world is due to people who want to feel important. They don’t mean to do harm. But the harm does not interest them. Or they do not see it, or they justify it. Because they are absorbed in the endless struggle to think well of themselves.” – T. S. Eliot
Related: 17 Techniques of Truth Suppression