David Miscavige & the King of the Gypsies

When dealing with elaborate frauds, context is everything. Those new to my screeds should google Arnie Lerma +xenu and read for a while to provide context. At minimum you need to have read these two articles one in the Washington Post, the other NY Newsday  for this blog entry to have proper context.  Christmas Day article 1994 LINK,  and the August Raid LINK

southpark-volcano

It was winter 1996/1997, I’d had a lot of publicity from RTC vs Lerma, the Federal case that authenticated “XENU” as the real deal…

A gentlemen called and said he was a journalist from Canada and happened to be in town and wanted to meet with me, having  read about me in the newspaper and wanted to speak to me. I said “fine”, as I had met with dozens of journalists by now and we agreed to meet at a gin mill on the west side of 19th street NW between M Street and K Street in the club district south of Dupont Circle.

I walked in and saw a fellow sitting alone at a table for two, and he looked up, saw me and waved me over.

The King of the Gypsies”

He introduced himself, saying his name was Ian Hancock, this Ian Hancock.

He introduced himself and said he was considered by some to be “The King of the Gypsies” He told me that President Bill Clinton had made him an honorary ambassador to the United Nations for the Romani in America, and had given him a nice plaque to hang on the wall. At the time I thought this was rather impressive, as if to convey that his words had a certain authority.  I had previously met with party leaders of Germany’s Parliament including Rennate Rennabach ans Ursurla Caberta at the Freidrich Ebert Stiftung Foundation to advise them on how to best deal with the Scientology problem, tried my hand at lobbying on Capitol Hill for the anti-scientology cause, and being born and raised in Washington DC met my share of VIPs. My electronics business had serviced the needs of Wonderman, and the Crown Prince of Iran, so perhaps I was not quite as impressed with this gentleman’s authority as others might have been,..  anyway, back to this strange tale.

Mr Ian Hancock then told me a story:

The Death of John McMaster

He said was in the U.K. and had interviewed a once famous celebrity $cientologist named John McMaster* .  Jon McMaster was a dapper and eloquent charismatic speaker in the Scientology movement in the 1960’s.

Mr Hancock said that he interviewed John McMaster in a “Manchester flop house” shortly before he passed away.  He claimed that Mr McMaster told him that when he was St Hill Manor, that Hubbard would taunt him about  being gay, and on one occassion when Hubbard knocked on his door, Hubbard was standing the naked, wearing stockings and a garter belt, and pranced around the room after he came in. Quite a story, I was somewhat awed.

After describing details in this incident in lurid detail  he then described the death bed scene:

“John McMaster lay in his bed dying, his room was filled with dead flowers.”

Then,  Mr Hancock  said that it would better if I criticized L. Ron Hubbard instead of David Miscavige.(see note3)  As the conversation continued he restated the general idea that it would be better to be critical of “Ron” instead of “Miscavige”.  After each restatement he would pause, and I noted he seemed to be watching me intently, and he would say:

“BECAUSE DEAD MEN CAN’T SUE”

11not_scared_of_you18

The implication was unmistakable: I can’t be sued by Hubbard for saying he was a rat-bastard because he is dead, but I could be sued by David Miscavige.

It was apparent to me that he was chatting me up on behalf of David Miscavige(see note2).. leaning on me to not criticize Mr Miscavige, and instead criticize Mr. Hubbard. And using some kind of persuasion techniques to accomplish this. At the time of this meeting I had not yet begun my research into covert methods of persuasion(Note2), all I knew was that this was a strange meeting.

Why was “The King of the Gypsies” being a water boy for David Miscavige?

And.. just how deep does this particular rabbit hole go??

_________________________________________________________


Note:  Hubbard was the Founder of scientology and David Miscavige used despicable means to take complete control of the scientology corporate structure after Hubbard’s death in 1986. Here is ONE example Hubbard appointed a gal to be the Director of CST, for LIFE. CST is the corporate structure that owns the copyrights and licenses them to the local scientology organizations for a commission fee on their income. Scientologists will note that the copyright notice in their books says “Copyright held by RTC”  held.. not Owned.. CST OWNS them. CST is the big kahuna of the Scientology empire of lies.

This gal had lifetime dream. Her dream job was to manage a horse farm in New Zealand. Well wouldn’t you know,  David Miscavige knew about this girls dream, and arranged everything. To the gal it was a serendipitous opportunity, perhaps a gift from God, when a man she had chanced to cross paths with said that he needed a manager for his beautiful horse farm in New Zealand. The girl then did what any normal person would do, she jumped at this opportunity. Giving up her appointment from L Ron Hubbard himself, as The Director for LIFE of CST.

With the Hubbard appointed-for-life director out of the way, David Miscavige was free to move in… Source: Ex Scientology Office of Special Affairs lawyer Joseph Vannier’s book “Arrows in the Dark”

Consider the efforts taken to demonize him, and implication of the details above…
see image halfway down this page LINK

Note2: Those who have read my other pages may recognize that The King of the Gypsies was trying to hypnotize me…giving me a direct suggestion, to not criticize David Miscavige.

He combined story telling, with AUTHORITATIVE SUGGESTION, HEAVY EMOTIONAL CONTENT, REPETITION,  DIRECT SUGGESTION, – the Shock and Awe method

The name of the METHOD I believe might have been leaked by George Bush..as he likely had been shown the method, then said it on TV, It is called Shock and Awe.

Then you tell him an enormous TRUTH… such as, there is a breakaway ‘civilization’ and the US has a colony on Mars and those black triangles are US, using anti gravity. Then you show him some pictures… Staff lists… etc..

-or- the world is going to end in 180 days… or three buildings were destroyed in Manhattan by terrorists….

At this point thinking has been stopped, he is in shock and awe!

When thinking stops the door to the subconscious is left unguarded..

Then you tell him the suggestion you want him to believe to be true.

“Anything said to a hypnotized subject is true for them” said the father of weaponized hypnosis, Dr. George Estabrooks in 1943

===

Incidentally, this was also one of the techniques Hubbard used for OT level III… Xenu and the Wall of Fire…

Note3:  When David Miscavige was first in the CMO, Commodores Messenger Organization, he was young, short, and had and still has asthma. He would lean against the railing, cupping his hands to hide his use of an inhaler. At that time Suzette Hubbard was the CMO boss, and she gave him the nickname “The Asthmatic Dwarf” which is what was referred to with derision behind his back.  The phrase is (c) Suzette Hubbard.

evil-hubbard-and-mini-me-scavige

It has been noted that before his rise to power, that David Miscavige appeared to have some sort of influence with Hubbard, the bottom of this page just might explain why. LINK

Thank you for reading all the way to the end, in this tl:dr age, it is encouraging. There is an enormous amount of data that must be read and thoroughly digested to grasp the enormity of the fraud called Scientology. please send this link to recovering scientologists both  a chuckle and insight into just how far the Asthmatic Dwarf’s Empire will go to get what they want, and make your dreams come true.

Dr Robert Oppenhiemer’s warning: The power of Mind Control makes the atomic bomb seem TRIVIAL

Excerpt from The Bulletin of the Atomic Physicists, May 1959

Screenshot from 2015-10-14 16:53:44

Dr. J. Robert Oppenheimer, director of the Los Alamos Laboratory and responsible for the research and design of an atomic bomb. He is often known as the “father of the atomic bomb.” The top secret project to develop the first atomic bomb was called
THE MANHATTAN PROJECT At a lecture to the American Psychological Association in 1952 and published in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists of May 1959 he said:

“In the last ten years physicists have been extraordinarily noisy about the immense powers, largely through their efforts, but through other efforts as well have come into the possession of man, powers notably and strikingly for very large scale and dreadful destruction. We have spoken of our responsibilities and our obligations to society in terms that sound very provincial, because the psychologist can hardly do anything without realizing that for him the acquisition of knowledge opens up the most terrifying prospects of controlling what people do and how they feel. This is true for all of you who are engaged in practice, and as the corpus of psychology gains in certitude and subtlety and skill. I can see that the physicists pleas that what he discovers be used with humanity and be used wisely will seem trivial compared to those pleas which you will have to make and for which you will be responsible.”

NOTE: The comment that immediately follows the statement above:

“This was for many psychologists, a most sobering observation. The possibility of controlling human behavior becomes a more terrifying prospect than the control of nuclear reactions”

And note who this gentlemen represents:

Arthur (Art) J. Bachrach (born March 20, 1923 – December 19, 2011) was an American psychologist and administrator, who was Professor and Chairman of the Department of Psychology at Arizona State University, and Director of the Environmental Stress Program and Chair of Psychophysiology at the Naval Medical Research Institute at the Naval Medical Center in Bethesda.

Read the entire article from The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists

Editors note: In this series it is important to read all of the blog entries and links if needed, before going further in this series, some of the coming exposes would be impossibly long winded to explain without your already understanding the materials presented previously.

Once you have learned just ONE METHOD, a few of which have been presented in prior blog postings, life around you will begin to look just a bit differently than it appeared before..

Edit: The issue, the point, the reason for my posting this, is to nudge the collective perception, towards a greater understanding of the FACT that TRUTH CONTROL,  belongs at the TOP of the list of “WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION” ahead of the atomic bomb.

The founders of this nation realized this in their own way, and because of this, they wrote the 1st Amendment.

Thank you for reading, please help spread these words.

Arnie Lerma
Lermanet.com Exposing the CON since 1993

DEMONIZATION FOR PROFIT

hubbard-cartoon-private-eye-87
Above Hubbard cartoon from a 1987 issue of UK’s Private Eye magazine

DEMONIZATION FOR THE PROFIT

Below: Have you seen this crazy man?

lermaarnie01
Implication: Why would anyone listen to kitchen help?

I was picketing on the side walk on Connecticut Avenue in front of $cientology’s Washington DC Hypnosis Facility. I was at the corner of Connecticut Avenue and R Streets NW. This was back around 2000. The image was taken from their own religiousfreedomwatch.org website.

For those interested in details, copy the image and zoom in… The kitchen background can be seen to have been photo-shopped into this picture, the light isnt right, and my shirt was a yellow cotton button down, not white polyester kitchen help.. This is a few steps beyond reality, and produced mainly for their own hypnotised members for which

“If it’s true for you, it’s true for you”  is their version of “truth”.

One of their operatives had been baiting me in a similar manner that BBC Reporter John Sweeney was being bull baited when he blew up at the camera. This is based on a written training routine called Reporter Training Routines. Here is an excerpt:

He does this either by a snide remark, question or comment, or by physical overwhelm, whichever seems the right action……. LINK

Anyhow after perhaps an hour of her badgering I lost my temper, but I did not lose teeth, get distorted and teleport to a restaurant kitchen.

That face is my face, with a few edits. but yes I was angry at the taunts being made on Connecticut Avenue in front of their brainwashing facility, and these were taunts that made no sense to me whatsoever – until she snapped her photo.

Scientology has extensive photo shop experience…    Even if I was made angry, and then distorted, and my face made lumpy, and a front tooth removed and transported magically into a kitchen I know not where, at least *I* still have my head. Check out THE MAN WITH NO HEAD story here.

oreilly_0001

Hubbard had no problems lying, in Dianetics he compares his fraudulent creation as being

“comparable to the discovery fire”

The only thing about Dianetics and Scientology that is comparable in magnitude to the discovery of fire, is the magnitude of the lie. Based on covert methods to cause a person to become more suggestible, it is clinical hypnotism for hire. Hubbard could NOT call it what it was… Hypnosis Clinics. He would have been regulated by the authorities. So Hubbard had no choice, he had to lie, so he did what he was good at, he told us a story about discovering a new technology of the mind. He said his new technology would raise you to your highest potential, achieving god like status and psychic powers..

And it was a hell of a good story.  But, even the old hypnotists, in  the Journal of Hypnotism, 1952, described this supposed discovery of fire as, and I quote:

“The same old sofa, with new upholstery” LINKand LINK

And the first official government inquiry into Dianetics and Scientology concluded the same:

“Many scientology techniques are in fact hypnotic techniques, and Hubbard has not changed their nature by changing their names. Hubbard seems quite capable of thinking that if he postulates that scientology techniques are different from hypnotic techniques then they are different. Whether or not Hubbard realises that the only differences are in name, his followers loyally and uncritically accept his word and believe that scientology techniques are distinctively Hubbardian and that hypnosis is something quite different and evil and to be avoided. A number of scientology witnesses, when asked what they believed hypnosis to be, answered vaguely that it was some sort of stage technique for mesmerising people by the waving of hands in front of them, or some such thing. It may, of course, be that, but it is many other things also and of its real nature Hubbard’s followers seem generally to be unaware. The common practice of Hubbard is to change the names of hypnotic phenomena to names of his own invention, purporting thereby to change the nature and significance of such phenomena. Thus, a form of unconsciousness experienced in hypnosis he has renamed variously ” anaten “, ” boil-off”, and ” dope-off ” ; hypnotic hallucinations he has called ” mental image pictures” ; and ” dissociation ” he has called ” exteriorization “”
Report of the Board of Enquiry into Scientology
by Kevin Victor Anderson, Q.C.
Published 1965 by the State of Victoria, Australia

CHAPTER 18
Page 115 LINK

There is no question what Dianetics and Scientology are, there is, however considerable ignorance about what hypnosis is and how it is done.

In typewritten notes by Forrest Ackerman, Hubbard’s Literary Agent, he describes watching Hubbard give a stunning performance to a meeting of the Science Fiction club in Los Angeles. During this demonstration, Hubbard caused one young man to believe he was holding cute miniature kangaroo in his hand, who then went around showing everyone his prize in his cupped hands. Another kid, was told while holding onto a stairwell banister that he was holding onto a red-hot iron railing and he could not let go. The kid was screaming in paid. This last demonstration reminds me of the condition of many scientologists. LINK (half way down the page to images)

Another apt comparison is to do a google search for “Bad Effects of Hypnosis” the results describe the thousands of horror stories of scientology.

And I recently learned that the state of Florida has a law on its books that could shut $cientology down, called The Hypnosis Law

Perhaps now “Something CAN be done about it”

========================================================================

And this is Hubbard’s attitude toward law:

Here is what his own son said under penalty of perjury:

“my father always felt that he was above the law because he had created the law. He created whatever rules, regulations, and laws to be lived by. There was only one sin in Scientology, which was repeated to me at least a few thousand times, which is, getting caught.